I am confused. . .

  • Posted by Judson Phillips on April 11, 2014 at 7:18am in Tea Party Nation Forum

    How did Barack Obama win reelection in 2012?

    There are a lot of reasons given.  Mitt Romney was a terrible candidate.  That is certainly true.  Conservatives stayed home. Again, that is true.  Romney and his brain trust made no effort to reach out to conservatives or even appear to be a conservative, so conservatives stayed home.

    But there may be another reason why Barack Obama, the worst President in American history, managed to squeak out another term.

    What is the shocking secret that may explain how Obama got a second term?

    A study done in North Carolina showed that 35,750 people who live and voted in North Carolina may have voted in another state in the 2012 Presidential election.  The study was based on comparing the first and last names along with date of birth for people who voted in 28 other states.  In 765 of those cases, social security numbers matched as well.

    This number would have probably been larger but only 28 states participated and the four largest states, California, New York, Texas and Florida did not participate.

    If you extrapolate this figure out over the entire population, that could be over one million double votes in 2012. 

    Liberals shriek that voter fraud never happens.  Conservatives don’t engage in voter fraud but liberals do.  Only weeks ago, Democrats in Cincinnati celebrated the release from jail of Melowese Richardson.  The poll worker and Obama bot confessed to voting for Obama multiple times.

    She saw nothing wrong with that as she pledged her allegiance to her Dear Leader.   Richardson was prosecuted in Ohio court and was convicted and given a five year sentence. Leftist groups screamed in horror that a Democrat convicted of voter fraud would actually have to serve a prison sentence and pressured the authorities in Ohio to grant her an early release.  Illegally voting in a Presidential Election is a federal offense, but Attorney General Eric Holder shows about as much interest in prosecuting Richardson as he does in going after the criminals at the IRS.

    The results of this North Carolina study are not just alarming, they could have changed the outcome of the 2012 election. 

    Mitt Romney lost the popular vote.  But a shift of 333,000 votes in four states would have given him an electoral win. 

    As reported by Breitbart in November 2012:

    Romney lost New Hampshire’s 4 electoral college votes by a margin of 40,659. Obama won with 368,529 to Romney’s  327,870.

    Romney lost Florida’s 29 electoral college votes  by a margin of 73,858. Obama won with 4,236,032 to Romney’s 4,162,174.

    Romney lost Ohio’s 18 electoral college votes by a margin of 103,481. Obama won with 2,697,260 to Romney’s 2,593,779

    Romney lost Virginia’s 13 electoral college votes by a margin of 115,910. Obama won with 1,905,528 to Romney’s  1,789,618.

    Add the 64 electoral college votes from this switch of 333,908 votes in these four key states to Romney’s 206, remove them from Obama’s 332, and Romney defeats Obama 270 to 268.

    If all fifty states had participated in the North Carolina study, the numbers would be much higher.

    It is also worth remembering that Obama did not carry a single state that has voter ID laws.

    Democrats are not winning elections.  They are taking them the old fashioned way.  They are stealing them.

  • Advertisements

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

    Tag Cloud

    %d bloggers like this: